Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cai Weisi results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Slippery Slope, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 117 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,667 of 28,364 speakers). This Cai Weisi is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Cai Weisi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 117
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
15.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos117 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.9%11.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos