Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C&H results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 21 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (731 of 28,364 speakers). This C&H is worse (more manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
C&H
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510097.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

C&H Sugar⁠39%
www.kqed.org⁠61%7/12/2026, 1:12:35 PM