Speaker summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Buzz Aldrin results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 271 faulty-reasoning hits from 346 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,618 of 28,364 speakers). This Buzz Aldrin is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Buzz Aldrin
Speaker details
Total words: 346
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos346 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos