Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryan Byrd results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,281 of 28,364 speakers). This Bryan Byrd is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Bryan Byrd
Speaker details
Total words: 167
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.3% percentile
8.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos167 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos