Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruce Greyson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Middle Ground as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 77 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,964 of 28,364 speakers). This Bruce Greyson is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Bruce Greyson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠30%Bruce Greyson (selected)19%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Middle Ground: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.3%Middle GroundSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos