Speaker summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 526.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Britney Win results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 150.318 hits . Analysis detected 1,472.435 faulty-reasoning hits from 526.333 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,900 of 28,364 speakers). This Britney Win is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Britney Win
Speaker details
Total words: 526.333
Video count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.2% percentile 10.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos526.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 28.6% 28.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 25.2% 25.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 18.4% 18.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 21.2% 21.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 0.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Middle Ground: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst