Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brianne Kane results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 63.7% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,393 of 28,364 speakers). This Brianne Kane is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Brianne Kane
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 82.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
19.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.7%63.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos