Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Briann Greenfield results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 101 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,676 of 28,364 speakers). This Briann Greenfield is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Briann Greenfield
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
23.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.8%27.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos