Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Panish results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Begging the Question, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 71.3% saturation with 40.613 hits. Analysis detected 278.613 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,880 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Panish is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Brian Panish
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
53.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 71.3%71.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.5%42.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 71.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos