Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video30.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian King results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 30.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 87.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,913 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian King is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Brian King
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 30.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
87.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos30.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos