Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Karalus results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,221 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Karalus is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Brian Karalus
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
34.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.8%34.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.8%34.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.8%34.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos