Speaker summary
⁠99%2 analyzed articles/videos119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Hooker results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 393.708 faulty-reasoning hits from 119 analyzed words across 2 videos, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,935 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Hooker is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Brian Hooker
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 119
Video count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
27.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos119 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 47.5%47.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 35.8%35.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 47.5%, sitewide 0.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 7.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos