Speaker summary
ā 58%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Hoberman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 88.7% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 194.906 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.4% and a BS Rank of ā 73% (7,748 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Hoberman is worse (more manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group.
Brian Hoberman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 73%Brian Hoberman (selected)55%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.7% percentile
54.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 88.7%88.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 59.9%59.9%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 44.3%44.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 24.7%24.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 88.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 59.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos