Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Frange results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 978.209 faulty-reasoning hits from 348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,570 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Frange is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Brian Frange
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos348 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.2%33.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 14.3%14.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.4%11.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.8%13.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos