Speaker summary
⁠70%3 analyzed articles/videos54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Connors results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 37.299 hits. Analysis detected 71.733 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 57.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,331 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Connors is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Brian Connors
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
57.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 60.2%60.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 55.5%55.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 60.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 55.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos