Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Cogan results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 229 faulty-reasoning hits from 127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (18,039 of 26,730 speakers). This Brian Cogan is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Brian Cogan
Speaker details
Total words: 127
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
20.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos127 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.3%18.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos