Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brett Schreiber results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 271.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,319 of 28,364 speakers). This Brett Schreiber is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Brett Schreiber
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
28.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 39.1%39.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 7.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos