Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breanna Schermerhorn results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,657 of 28,364 speakers). This Breanna Schermerhorn is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Breanna Schermerhorn
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos