Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breaking the Silence results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 67.9% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,556 of 28,364 speakers). This Breaking the Silence is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Breaking the Silence
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
56.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 64.3%64.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 67.9%67.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 35.7%35.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 67.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos