Speaker summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 1,610.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Vigliarolo results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Pessimism Bias , and Recency Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 266.549 hits . Analysis detected 2,270.748 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,610.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,868 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandon Vigliarolo is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Brandon Vigliarolo
Speaker details
Total words: 1,610.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst