Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Rivera results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,364 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandon Rivera is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Brandon Rivera
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.2% percentile
17.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.9%21.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 21.9%21.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.7%17.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anecdotal: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos