Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Herrera results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Unattributed Quote, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 97 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,102 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandon Herrera is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Brandon Herrera
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
24.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos