Speaker summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 437.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Adler results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 169 hits . Analysis detected 1,569.097 faulty-reasoning hits from 437.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,727 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandon Adler is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Brandon Adler
Speaker details
Total words: 437.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 9.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos437.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 28.5% 28.5% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 26.7% 26.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 21.3% 21.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Dunning-Kruger Effect Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 24.8% 24.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Straw Man: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 0.0% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst