Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video89 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bram Sable-Smith results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 89 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,297 of 28,364 speakers). This Bram Sable-Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Bram Sable-Smith
Speaker details
Total words: 89
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
38.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos89 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.8%43.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos