Speaker summary
81% 2 analyzed articles/videos 229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bradley Chambers results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 61.1% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 511 faulty-reasoning hits from 229 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.6% and a BS Rank of 30% (20,024 of 28,364 speakers). This Bradley Chambers is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Bradley Chambers
Speaker details
Total words: 229
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 18.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos229 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 61.1% 61.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 38.9% 38.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 61.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst