Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bradley Akubuiro results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 85.1% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 127 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,368 of 26,841 speakers). This Bradley Akubuiro is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Bradley Akubuiro
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
45.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 85.1%85.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 85.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos