Speaker summary
81%2 analyzed articles/videos225.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Woodhouse results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69.6% saturation with 157.096 hits. Analysis detected 756.235 faulty-reasoning hits from 225.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.3% and a BS Rank of 38% (17,875 of 28,656 speakers). This Brad Woodhouse is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Brad Woodhouse
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
23.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos225.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often