Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video30.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Hannig results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 30.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,467 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Hannig is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Brad Hannig
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 30.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos