Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Dethloff results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 175.995 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,850 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Dethloff is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Brad Dethloff
Speaker details
Total words: 105
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
20.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos105 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos