Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video476.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Case results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, False Dilemma, and Circular Reasoning, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 860.871 faulty-reasoning hits from 476.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,160 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Case is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Brad Case
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 476.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.2% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos476.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.8%21.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.8%11.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.5%1.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos