Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Bourque results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 62.8% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,620 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Bourque is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Brad Bourque
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
62.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 62.8%62.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 62.8%62.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 62.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 62.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos