Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston Duck Tours results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,194 of 28,364 speakers). This Boston Duck Tours is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Boston Duck Tours
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos