Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol agents results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Status Quo Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (506 of 28,364 speakers). This Border Patrol agents is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Border Patrol agents
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos