Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video84.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bonnie Clark results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 78 faulty-reasoning hits from 84.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,038 of 28,364 speakers). This Bonnie Clark is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Bonnie Clark
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 84.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos84.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos