Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video31.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,461 of 28,364 speakers). This Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein
Speaker details
Total words: 31.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos