Speaker summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bo Stjerne Thomsen results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 54.5% saturation with 82.5 hits . Analysis detected 395.667 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,330 of 28,364 speakers). This Bo Stjerne Thomsen is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Bo Stjerne Thomsen
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 21.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 49.5% 49.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 54.5% 54.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 49.5% 49.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 33.7% 33.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst