Speaker summary
⁠99%2 analyzed articles/videos68.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Prady results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 87.2% saturation with 80.655 hits. Analysis detected 298.295 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,437 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Prady is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Bill Prady
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
37.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos68.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 87.2%87.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.2%75.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 87.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos