Speaker summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Kopsky results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 60 hits . Analysis detected 492.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.2% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,781 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Kopsky is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Bill Kopsky
Speaker details
Total words: 168
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 17.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos168 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst