Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video81.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Davison results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 43.6% saturation with 41.198 hits. Analysis detected 261.198 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,944 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Davison is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Bill Davison
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 81.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
27.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos81.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.8%61.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos