Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Bodner results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,157 of 28,364 speakers). This Bill Bodner is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Bill Bodner
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
80.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos