Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Big 12 results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 522 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,474 of 28,364 speakers). This Big 12 is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Big 12
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 145
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
37.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos145 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos