Speaker summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 173.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Tylek results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 576.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 173.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of 29% (20,303 of 28,364 speakers). This Bianca Tylek is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Bianca Tylek
Speaker details
Total words: 173.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 18.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos173.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 51.5% 51.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 51.5% 51.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst