Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Santorini results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Straw Man, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 444.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,932 of 28,364 speakers). This Bianca Santorini is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Bianca Santorini
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
35.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 58.4%58.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.8%43.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.6%41.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.2%29.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.8%20.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Straw Man: Speaker 58.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Speaker 43.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 1.9%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos