Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Tasis results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Burden of Proof, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 232 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,316 of 27,797 speakers). This Beth Tasis is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Beth Tasis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 79
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
25.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos79 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 28.5%28.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos