Speaker summary
47%7 analyzed articles/videos199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Silverman results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.6% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 681 faulty-reasoning hits from 199 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (19,934 of 28,364 speakers). This Beth Silverman is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Beth Silverman
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
18.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos199 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.6%46.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate