Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bernice Onuoha results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.9% saturation with 55.5 hits. Analysis detected 265.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,440 of 28,364 speakers). This Bernice Onuoha is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Bernice Onuoha
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
41.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 64.9%64.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.9%64.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 48.7%48.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.5%32.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 64.9%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos