Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benny Boscio Jr. results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 82.8% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 311.774 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (10,716 of 26,780 speakers). This Benny Boscio Jr. is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Benny Boscio Jr.
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 84.5%84.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 82.8%82.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 41.4%41.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.2%17.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 84.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 82.8%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos