Speaker summary
ā 48%1 analyzed article/video1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Steinberg results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,113.63 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 2% (28,047 of 28,364 speakers). This Benjamin Steinberg is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Benjamin Steinberg
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 2%Benjamin Steinberg (selected)4%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,149
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos