Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video79.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Chevat results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 73.875 hits. Analysis detected 251.069 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,339 of 28,364 speakers). This Benjamin Chevat is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Benjamin Chevat
Speaker details
Total words: 79.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos79.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 63.1%63.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.3%26.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 63.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 1.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos