Speaker summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Trammell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 141 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (16,333 of 26,866 speakers). This Ben Trammell is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Ben Trammell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠40%Ben Trammell (selected)25%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 141
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
24.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos141 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos